From 9ca1a1c1c7bf56e39b516c299b4e0d3efe59652b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kassouni Spec 3 (Wendell, Pete, Booker, Jack) uses sequence 244 / bank 157, which has 83
-instruments — codes The one real casualty is Code range Instruments Reached by 0x01–0x520–81 the phonology engine — short/long vowels, consonants, all 52 two-character digraphs plus you
-0x01–0x40also the anti-repetition random substitution ( rand() >> 2)
+0x53–0x7682–117 only mode 1 — one entry per digit and letter, in order 0x53–0x7682–117 only mode 1 — one entry per digit and letter, in order (on bank 157, instrument 82 is instead the you substitute, see below)
@@ -92,24 +92,31 @@ phonology-only bank — and that is exactly what it is.
0x77118 the you digraph, and nothing elseWhy bank 157 is short
0x01–0x53. That covers the entire phonology
-output range (≤ 0x52) with one to spare, and omits the letter-name block
-that spec 3 can never reach, since the editor is always spec 5 or 6.you (0x77): the sequence's dynamic
-table clamps out-of-range entries to the last routine, so a spec-3 voice saying "you"
-plays instrument 82 instead. That is one wrong syllable on a common word, in four
-NPCs' voices.0x01–0x52 → instruments 0–81) — and omits the letter-name
+block that spec 3 can never reach, since the editor is always spec 5 or 6.
The 83rd instrument is not spare. Sequence 244's dynamic table maps codes
+0x53–0x76 to explicit silence and maps you
+(0x77) to instrument 82 — a sample reachable through no
+other path, played at a lower note than the other two voices'
+you (semitone 41 vs 44; see the disc page). So bank
+157 carries a dedicated you substitute, and spec-3 voices lack nothing
+audible. Whether instrument 82 is an actual "you" recording is testable the same way as
+the letter names: extract it and listen.
extraction.md §2.4, which described bank 157
-as "collapsing every digraph sample above 0x53 onto one sound". Nothing above
-0x53 is a digraph — the block is not phonology at all.
+This corrects two earlier readings. Working notes once described bank 157 as
+"collapsing every digraph sample above 0x53 onto one sound" — nothing above
+0x53 is a digraph, the block is not phonology at all. A later revision of
+these pages then claimed the dynamic table "clamps out-of-range entries to the last
+routine" — it does not; the mapping of 0x77 → instrument 82 is an explicit
+table entry, verified on disc.